Friday 14 November 2014

City of God Representation and Institutional Distribution/Accesibility of World Cinema

Starter:



The characters and representation



In managing to extricate himself from the slum Rocket, despite his explosive and fiery name, represents hope. His is the character that escapes the trap of poverty and violence and his soothing voice often acts as an antidote to the violence on the screen. The shot of him in the opening sequence is symbolic in that throughout the film he remains the outsider caught between the police and the gangs. We sympathise with him because he is hopeless at football, crime, getting a girlfriend and fails to take revenge for his brother’s murder. At Bene’s farewell he is apart from the crowd, up on the stage helping the DJ. He tries to lead a normal life, in the supermarket, and delivering the newspapers. He does escape, but only because he is able to exploit his connections in the slum.  His role in the film is symbolised by the shot at the end of the opening sequence, showing him trapped between the gang and the police, not part of either faction.

In contrast, Lil Ze represents hoplessness. We know that there is no way out for him except through death. He starts off as a bullying child, then a killer child, with no fear or conscience. He assumes control and power through violence, but his motivation is not through greed, he doesn’t show any ambition to leave the apartment, but by pure evil. He seems to have no redeeming features, nothing that we can identify with, and the only occasion when we feel slightly sorry for him, at Bene’s farewell when he is rejected by girls who he asks to dance, is followed by the violent rape of Ned’s girlfriend. He kills Tuba just because he talks too much. He dies when a child shoots him, a legacy of his own infantile violence.

Bene is the opposite of Ze, and is a representation of a good gangster. A man with a conscience who tries to curb some of Ze’s violent behaviour. He is both charming and popular, and although he witnesses violence we don’t see him committing any murders. Unlike Ze he is drawn to a life outside the slum, initially through contact with Thiago and the trappings of new clothes, then he dyes his hair to make him look more European. Like his brother Shaggy, who died when his girlfriend persuaded him to leave the slum, Bene’s relationship with Angelica changes him and leads to his death, which is bound up with the rejection of Ze’s values. In leaving his psychopathic friend he is leaving hi without any restraining forces and unleashes more terrible forces.

Knockout Ned is drawn into the Carrots gang to avenge the death of his brother and father and rape of his girlfriend. He is the only one of the four leading characters not seen as a child, and has seen life outside the slum, as a soldier and bus driver. He is the stereotypical tragic hero forced to use his skills on his quest for retribution. Initially he tries to tone down Carrots violence, insisting that no innocent people are shot, but the rules have to be broken, the irony is that it is Ned’s exception to the rule which causes his eventual death at the hands of Otto. He is the one destructive character who seems to retain some humanity. He is visibly moved by Steak n’Fries death and it his mourning over the body that leads to him being shot and captured by the police.

Carrot’s character is an enigma itself, we know nothing of his background – surely in the book all the characters were thoroughly developed. His function in the narrative is sketchy but crucial. He is the instigator of Ned’s downfall. He is ruthless, killing Aristotle who he thought of as a brother. He is white, but most of his gang members are black, which emphasises the lack of any particular racial issues in the story. The Tender Trio represent a different age. They have no nominated boss, they do things together, their guns are toys, accessories to their bravado. They are amateurs. The film centres on the aggressive definition of masculinity. The female characters have passive and peripheral roles, they are there to be recipients of male violence and are attacked murdered and raped. None of the women, apart from Marina, have pivotal roles.

Ideology, Values, Institution
“If you run away they’ll get you and if you stay, they’ll get you too.”
Violence is the main driving force of the film. Shootings, beatings and rape form the core of the action. But the film’s attitude to violence is a means to an end for the film maker’s main motivation for making the film -   the wish for social change. It shows that the favelas are a breeding ground for this violence because the people have no hope of achieving anything other than through violence, however, apart from a brief reference to a flood being the cause of an influx of people the film makers do not provide any political reference points or background – the ‘sixties’, the ‘seventies’ are just chapter headings that don’t explain what was going on in Brazilian society that created these slums.
The film does have simple lessons to learn – if you live by the gun you die by the gun, if you avoid violence and retain some honest values and ambitions you escape. The film’s ending is on the one hand positive – Rocket is saved, but on the other hand the Runts are a more violent gang than ever. These are simplistic and stereotype the slum dwellers – presumably the majority of people are still trying to scrape some kind of honest living but you don’t see many examples of those except on the fringe of the plot.
The institutions backing the film had originally intended the film just for the Brazilian market, but the film’s success at Film Festivals gave it a life of its own, and Mierelles has used the film’s unprecedented success as a platform for to focus the world’s attention on the darkness of Rio’s slums, one of the most violent and dangerous places in South America. The film could not have been the commercial success it was without the backing of Miramax, the film distribution company, but remember Miramax is a commercial company, part of the Disney Corporation, who do not do things for charity, the people behind Miramax – the Weinstein brothers – must have spotted a commercial opportunity in the film.

No comments:

Post a Comment